<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Ohio Manufacturing Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="http://omi.osu.edu/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://omi.osu.edu</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 13:14:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Offerings by windows 8</title>
		<link>http://omi.osu.edu/find-resources/thrusts/comment-page-1/#comment-19487</link>
		<dc:creator>windows 8</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 13:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://omidev.osu.edu/?page_id=25#comment-19487</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;windows 8...&lt;/strong&gt;

There used to be any individual else that wrote something equivalent, however you did a significantly better job. Thanks for the read....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>windows 8&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>There used to be any individual else that wrote something equivalent, however you did a significantly better job. Thanks for the read&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dan Slane, On the US-China Relationship &amp; Manufacturing by Glenn Daehn</title>
		<link>http://omi.osu.edu/policy/dan-slane-on-the-us-china-relationship-manufacturing/comment-page-1/#comment-4765</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn Daehn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jan 2011 15:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://omi.osu.edu/?p=1833#comment-4765</guid>
		<description>Jeremy,

I agree...  However innovation is only part of the answer.  Ideas are easily adapted elsewhere or copied. Because of the varied conditions in other countries that Mr. Slane point out; manipulated currency, government in manufacturing facility elsewhere, we are at a disadvantage. We&#039;ll have wins and successes, but fewer than we need.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeremy,</p>
<p>I agree&#8230;  However innovation is only part of the answer.  Ideas are easily adapted elsewhere or copied. Because of the varied conditions in other countries that Mr. Slane point out; manipulated currency, government in manufacturing facility elsewhere, we are at a disadvantage. We&#8217;ll have wins and successes, but fewer than we need.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 5th Annual Photonic Doppler Velocimetry (PDV) Users Conference by Omi</title>
		<link>http://omi.osu.edu/events/pdv-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-3971</link>
		<dc:creator>Omi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jan 2011 07:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://omidev.osu.edu/?p=837#comment-3971</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Omi...&lt;/strong&gt;

[...] something about omi[...]...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Omi&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>[...] something about omi[...]&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Manufacturing Reading / Media List by boonanan</title>
		<link>http://omi.osu.edu/blog/manufacturing-reading-media-list/comment-page-1/#comment-2245</link>
		<dc:creator>boonanan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jan 2011 14:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://omi.osu.edu/?p=1563#comment-2245</guid>
		<description>It would be very helpful if you can provide reading list in &lt;a href=&quot;http://logistics-book.blogspot.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Logistics and Supply Chain Management&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be very helpful if you can provide reading list in <a href="http://logistics-book.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">Logistics and Supply Chain Management</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Genteel Nation by robert wiyono</title>
		<link>http://omi.osu.edu/blog/the-genteel-nation/comment-page-1/#comment-1465</link>
		<dc:creator>robert wiyono</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Dec 2010 13:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://omi.osu.edu/?p=1759#comment-1465</guid>
		<description>This is a smart blog. I mean it. You have so much knowledge about this issue, and so much passion. You also know how to make people rally behind it, obviously from the responses. Youve got a design here thats not too flashy, but makes a statement as big as what youre saying. Great job, indeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a smart blog. I mean it. You have so much knowledge about this issue, and so much passion. You also know how to make people rally behind it, obviously from the responses. Youve got a design here thats not too flashy, but makes a statement as big as what youre saying. Great job, indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Manufacturing Reading / Media List by michael c. hall</title>
		<link>http://omi.osu.edu/blog/manufacturing-reading-media-list/comment-page-1/#comment-1261</link>
		<dc:creator>michael c. hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 00:19:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://omi.osu.edu/?p=1563#comment-1261</guid>
		<description>thanks for that post. it is very useful for me. following your posts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for that post. it is very useful for me. following your posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dan Slane, On the US-China Relationship &amp; Manufacturing by Jeremy Jensen</title>
		<link>http://omi.osu.edu/policy/dan-slane-on-the-us-china-relationship-manufacturing/comment-page-1/#comment-567</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Jensen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 03:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://omi.osu.edu/?p=1833#comment-567</guid>
		<description>We absolutely NEED to keep and create manufacturing jobs in America. I recently met with the CEO of Mity Lite. I was amazed at the process he devised for keeping jobs in the US and specifically here in Utah. What was his plan? It was actually quite simple, he went to his manufacturing team and asked them to find a way to manufacture chairs cheaper in Utah than they could be imported from China. And, they figured it out! Americans are smart and innovative. We just need to be less apathetic! A service economy is not sustainable. We need to manufacture goods and we need to export them around the world. We need innovators who find ways to keep manufacturing jobs here in the US to share their success stories with each other and we need consumers who care.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We absolutely NEED to keep and create manufacturing jobs in America. I recently met with the CEO of Mity Lite. I was amazed at the process he devised for keeping jobs in the US and specifically here in Utah. What was his plan? It was actually quite simple, he went to his manufacturing team and asked them to find a way to manufacture chairs cheaper in Utah than they could be imported from China. And, they figured it out! Americans are smart and innovative. We just need to be less apathetic! A service economy is not sustainable. We need to manufacture goods and we need to export them around the world. We need innovators who find ways to keep manufacturing jobs here in the US to share their success stories with each other and we need consumers who care.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dan Slane, On the US-China Relationship &amp; Manufacturing by When The Music Stops &#171; Strengthening Brand America</title>
		<link>http://omi.osu.edu/policy/dan-slane-on-the-us-china-relationship-manufacturing/comment-page-1/#comment-293</link>
		<dc:creator>When The Music Stops &#171; Strengthening Brand America</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 12:45:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://omi.osu.edu/?p=1833#comment-293</guid>
		<description>[...] it powerful, alarming and thought provoking. Here is a link to an audio file of that talk &#8211; http://omi.osu.edu/policy/dan-slane-on-the-us-china-relationship-manufacturing/. Dan’s talk is well worth grabbing a cup of coffee and listening [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it powerful, alarming and thought provoking. Here is a link to an audio file of that talk &#8211; <a href="http://omi.osu.edu/policy/dan-slane-on-the-us-china-relationship-manufacturing/" rel="nofollow">http://omi.osu.edu/policy/dan-slane-on-the-us-china-relationship-manufacturing/</a>. Dan’s talk is well worth grabbing a cup of coffee and listening [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dan Slane, On the US-China Relationship &amp; Manufacturing by Ed Burghard</title>
		<link>http://omi.osu.edu/policy/dan-slane-on-the-us-china-relationship-manufacturing/comment-page-1/#comment-279</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Burghard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Nov 2010 11:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://omi.osu.edu/?p=1833#comment-279</guid>
		<description>Dan Slane does an amazing job of taking a complex global competitive challenge and explaining the root causes in a way that should stimulate practical action.  His insight into China&#039;s long-term economic strategy should raise broad based concern over America&#039;s ability to sustain global leadership in innovation.  In addition to the multiplier effect Dan describes, I believe manufacturing is a key enabler of innovation and invention.  One of the best ways to stimulate knowledge creation is by making things and observing first-hand the opportunities for process and product improvement.  The question for America is not - &quot;Should our nation pursue a manufacturing OR knowledge economy?&quot;.  Without manufacturing, America cannot realistically expect to create a sustainable knowledge economy. The question should be reframed to - &quot;How does our nation create a manufacturing AND knowledge economy?&quot;.  As Dan points out, China has rapidly shifted from low technology manufacturing to high technology.  In part, because their understanding of manufacturing methods and processes has helped China become more innovative and inventive.  When companies in China run into manufacturing problems, they are not dependent on America&#039;s knowledge to solve them, they are innovating their own solutions.  Over time, China&#039;s innovative and inventive capability will strengthen.  Outsourcing manufacturing to China has provided China the means to successfully challenge America&#039;s global leadership in innovation and knowledge creation.  After listening to Dan&#039;s lecture, I raised the need to reframe the discussion in a blog post (http://strengtheningbrandamerica.com/blog/?p=417).  The reader comments are illuminating.  Dan Slane has rung the alarm bells.  It is time for America to hear them and respond.  It is time for our nation to understand that to create a sustainable knowledge economy, we must maintain a strong domestic manufacturing industry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan Slane does an amazing job of taking a complex global competitive challenge and explaining the root causes in a way that should stimulate practical action.  His insight into China&#8217;s long-term economic strategy should raise broad based concern over America&#8217;s ability to sustain global leadership in innovation.  In addition to the multiplier effect Dan describes, I believe manufacturing is a key enabler of innovation and invention.  One of the best ways to stimulate knowledge creation is by making things and observing first-hand the opportunities for process and product improvement.  The question for America is not &#8211; &#8220;Should our nation pursue a manufacturing OR knowledge economy?&#8221;.  Without manufacturing, America cannot realistically expect to create a sustainable knowledge economy. The question should be reframed to &#8211; &#8220;How does our nation create a manufacturing AND knowledge economy?&#8221;.  As Dan points out, China has rapidly shifted from low technology manufacturing to high technology.  In part, because their understanding of manufacturing methods and processes has helped China become more innovative and inventive.  When companies in China run into manufacturing problems, they are not dependent on America&#8217;s knowledge to solve them, they are innovating their own solutions.  Over time, China&#8217;s innovative and inventive capability will strengthen.  Outsourcing manufacturing to China has provided China the means to successfully challenge America&#8217;s global leadership in innovation and knowledge creation.  After listening to Dan&#8217;s lecture, I raised the need to reframe the discussion in a blog post (<a href="http://strengtheningbrandamerica.com/blog/?p=417" rel="nofollow">http://strengtheningbrandamerica.com/blog/?p=417</a>).  The reader comments are illuminating.  Dan Slane has rung the alarm bells.  It is time for America to hear them and respond.  It is time for our nation to understand that to create a sustainable knowledge economy, we must maintain a strong domestic manufacturing industry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Automotive Industry Council Meeting Announcement by Mesa AZ Auto</title>
		<link>http://omi.osu.edu/technology/automotive-industry-council-overview-and-background/comment-page-1/#comment-117</link>
		<dc:creator>Mesa AZ Auto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 20:38:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://omidev.osu.edu/?p=269#comment-117</guid>
		<description>Technology Working Group of the automotive and manufacturing sector will attract the best engineering talent, a good look, considering the objective will possibly supply overall better engineering in the automotive industry, but how will this effect the 14 car manufactures across the United States?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Technology Working Group of the automotive and manufacturing sector will attract the best engineering talent, a good look, considering the objective will possibly supply overall better engineering in the automotive industry, but how will this effect the 14 car manufactures across the United States?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

